America’s New Emergency Backbones:

More Than Just FirstNet

If you hang around the public safety world long enough, you’ll hear people talk about “the network.” Sometimes they mean their radio system, sometimes their CAD system, and occasionally—usually after a particularly painful budget meeting—they mean a metaphorical network made of duct tape and prayer.

But increasingly, when we say the network, we’re talking about the backbone of next-generation emergency communications. And here’s the plot twist:

There isn’t just one. There are several. Some official. Some commercial. Some home-grown. And all of them matter.

Most people know about FirstNet. Far fewer know about the others quietly forming the real foundation of NG911. Let’s fix that.


FirstNet: The Official Backbone (With the Congressional Seal of Approval)

Let’s start with the federally sanctioned heavyweight: FirstNet, built by AT&T under a 25-year contract with the FirstNet Authority.

FirstNet is the one with:

  • Dedicated Band 14 spectrum – Reserved for Public Safety
  • Priority & preemption baked in – Transmissions go 1st – Lower priority traffic is booted
  • A massive deployable fleet – Dedicated deployment teams
  • Federal oversight (for better or worse)

It’s the public safety broadband network created after the 9/11 World Trade Center terrorist attacks on the US, when the country realized that if firefighters can’t talk to police and EMS can’t talk to anyone, bad things get much, much worse.

Cost: Agencies pay a subscription per device. The public doesn’t use it and doesn’t fund it directly outside of federal allocations.

Purpose: Provide a hardened, interoperable broadband communications backbone built specifically for first responders.

If FirstNet were a fire truck, it would be the one that arrived with polished chrome, a maintenance record thicker than a phone book, and a federal mandate to always start on the first try.


Verizon Frontline: The Veteran with Something to Prove

Next up is Verizon, who was doing public safety broadband long before the government decided to create an “official” network.

Verizon Frontline uses their regular consumer/commercial LTE/5G system, but with:

  • Priority service
  • Preemption capabilities
  • Tactical deployables (Trucks and trailers with Cell on Wheels COWs)
  • Dedicated response teams

They don’t have Band 14, but they do have decades of RF dominance and presence in many regions. And they’ve positioned themselves as the “non-government-controlled” option, which resonates with certain agencies that like their networks the way they like their MOU agreements: not too federal.

Cost: Very similar to FirstNet. Many agencies already have enterprise contracts making it easy to consume and add to existing contracts.

Purpose: Offer reliable broadband in areas where Verizon’s coverage historically crushes AT&T’s.

Verizon is basically the salty old veteran saying, “Oh, you built an official network? Cute. We’re going to be over here and will just keep doing what we’ve always done.”


T-Mobile’s Public Safety Network: The 5G Disruptor

Then there’s T-Mobile, which has entered the public safety space like someone walking into a bar and offering to pay for everyone’s tab.

With programs like Connecting Heroes and Advanced Network Solutions, T-Mobile has:

  • Aggressive pricing (including $0 lines in early phases)
  • A strong mid-band 5G footprint
  • Heavy IoT and data-analytics integration
  • Priority and preemption

If FirstNet is the official play and Verizon is the legacy play, T-Mobile is the new disruptor. They lean hard on 5G Ultra Capacity performance and IoT partnerships.

Cost: Often the lowest of the big three.

Purpose: Push a modern, data-centric approach to public safety connectivity.

T-Mobile feels like the tech-savvy rookie who actually read the entire NFPA manual before their first shift.


Private LTE/5G & CBRS: Build-It-Yourself Backbones

Now it gets really interesting.

More cities, counties, utilities, airports, and school systems are deploying private LTE and 5G networks using CBRS (Citizens Broadband Radio Service), private licensed spectrum, or shared neutral-host models.

Why? Because corporate and some local agencies:

  • Want coverage in areas carriers don’t prioritize (e.g. near offshore Oil Rig platforms)
  • Want control over uptime, security, and expansion
  • Want networks designed around their mission, not consumer pricing tiers

Think of these systems as the “garage-built hot rods” of public safety networks—except instead of chrome pipes and shaved door handles, we’re talking about eNodeBs, private cores, and edge compute clusters. Hot rods for tech nerds.

Cost: Higher up front. Lower long-term if managed properly.

Purpose: Local control, dedicated bandwidth, custom integration, and massively improved QoS for NG911 and IoT.

This is where NG911 starts to get exciting, because these networks can be designed to carry:

  • Real-time video
  • IoT sensor data
  • Indoor positioning metadata
  • Drone backhaul
  • ECC situational awareness apps
  • On-scene tactical mesh feeds

The carriers hate admitting this, but sometimes the locals build it better.


Satellite Networks: The Sky-Based Safety Net

Last but absolutely not least: satellite networks.

Iridium, Globalstar, Inmarsat, and most notably Starlink have each become essential to:

  • Remote 9-1-1 call access
  • Wildland incidents
  • Disaster recovery
  • Temporary command sites
  • Drone video backhaul
  • Mobile ECC operations

If terrestrial networks are the backbone, satellites are the backup spine no one talks about until all the towers blow over like the North Carolina hurricanes.

Cost: Moderate. Widely accessible to the public.

Purpose: Instant recovery connectivity when the grid, fiber, and cell towers all go down.

Satellites are the last mile, last resort, last “please let this still work” network safety net. Starlink proved that quick, minimal config deployments were possible, AND WORKED.


So What Does This All Mean for NG911?

It means the future emergency communications network in the U.S. won’t rely on a single backbone.

Instead, NG911 will ride across a:

  • Federally authorized broadband network
  • Commercial carrier networks
  • Private LTE and 5G systems
  • Utility and municipal infrastructure
  • Satellite constellations
  • Campus and enterprise networks
  • Wi-Fi 7 and short-range systems
  • Thousands of IoT sensor networks

In other words, NG911 becomes an ecosystem, not a platform.

The old world was simple:

A call entered the system one way, traveled one path, and arrived at one location.

The new world is distributed:

A call may originate over cell towers, fiber, Wi-Fi, satellite, enterprise bridges, IoT devices, or mixed media — and the backbones must support it all.

And here’s the kicker:

Every one of these networks costs something — either in dollars, coverage, spectrum, or risk.

But failing to modernize costs far more.


The Bottom Line

America is quietly building a multi-network, multi-provider, multi-path foundation for emergency communications. Some of it is official. Some commercial. Some municipal. Some orbital. All necessary.

Because the next generation of 9-1-1 will not run on one network.

It will run on every network.

And if we build this right — with interoperability, resilience, and the humility to learn from our past — we finally get closer to what NG911 has always promised:

the right data, at the right time, delivered to the right people, no matter what path it takes to get there.

If you find my blogs informative, I invite you to follow me on X @Fletch911. You can also follow my profiles on LinkedIN and Facebook and catch up on all my blogs at https://Fletch.tv. AND BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY LATEST PROJECT TiPS: Today on Public Safety @ http://911TiPS.com

Thanks for spending time with me; I look forward to next time. Stay safe and take care.

Follow me on Twitter/X @Fletch911
See my profiles on LinkedIN and Facebook
Check out my Blogs on: Fletch and http://911TiPS.com


© 2025, All Rights Reserved, Fletch 911, LLC
Reuse and quote permitted with attribution and URL

Leave a Reply